Sprint 1 Self Grading Checklist

All self and by peer grading must be complete prior to Teacher review date(s). Show a direct link to the tangible(s) for each line item.

Sprint1 Key Objectives

During the sprint you need to complete all of these key objectives and find and complete supporting hacks that show level of command you are declaring.

Rank to Ratio, rank is an integer 0 = .00 work, but faking understanding/accomplishment 1 = .55 incomplete assignment, big gaps 2 = .75 meeting some objectives, multiple little gaps 3 = .85 meeting most objectives, one little gap 4 = .90 meeting all objectives 4+Mastered-Y = .95 exceeding all objectives, requires links and office hours verification

Skill Mastered (y/n) Rank (1-4) Ratio Notes
Laptop Verification or Cloud Workspace [y] 4 0.00 verification by Linux commands notebook
VSCode [y] 4 0.00 live change code, commit, make, run localhost, test, debug
Show VSCode GitLens [y] 4 0.00 verify commits, show change, comments, reset to commit, run on old commit
GitHub student_2025 repo [y] 4 0.00 template create, push changes, verify id, review analytics
GitHub Pages Actions [y] 4 0.00 review runs and verify runtime, receive demo
JavaScript Notebook [y] 4 0.00 Hacks
Hacks GitHub Pages Playground [n] 4 0.00 Hacks
Hacks SASS Basics [n] 4 0.00 Hacks
Hacks Frontend [y] 1 0.00 Hacks
Pair Programming [n] 1 0.00 tangibles that show coop work
Total     0.0  
Average     0.0  

Learning Habits Table

Review criteria in habits. In this review, pairs should rate each other base on their experience with the person on the line item.

Rank to Ratio, rank is an integer
1 = .55 2 = .75 3 = .85 4 = .90 4+Mastered-Y = .95

Skill Mastered (y/n) Rank (1-4) Ratio Notes
Attendance [ ] 4 0.0  
Work Habits [ ] 3 0.0  
Behavior [ ] 3.5 0.0  
Timeliness [ ] 2.5 0.0  
Tech Sense [ ] 2 0.0  
Tech Talk [ ] 2 0.0  
Tech Growth [ ] 3 0.0  
Advocacy [ ] ? 0.0  
Comm & Collab [ ] 3 0.0  
Integrity [ ] 4 0.0  
Organized [ ] 3.5 0.0  
Total     0.0  
Average     0.0  

Sprint 2 Checklist

Assignment Points Grade
JSON Object & Arrays 1 0.9

JSON Object: A JSON Object is a way to store and organise data. They use Key and value pairs for this, a little different from arrays, which are structured differently. Ex For JSON Object:Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 22 52 37

Input and Output 1 0.90

Input: Information or data you give to a computer or program,Output: The result or information that the computer or program gives back to you. Example for this: In our RPG we can press ‘w’ (input) to make the turtle move up (output). This means: Pressing key (input) —-> movement (output)

Data Types 1 .90

Here are some examples for Data types: Numbers, strings, booleans, null, undefined, BigInt, Symbols. And SURPRISE they are different types of data. Her is an example for booleans: Screenshot 2024-10-09 at 23 10 09

Square and Red Squares 2 .90
Screenshot 2024-10-08 at 11 34 38
For Loops using Sprites 1 .9

I gave myself a 0.9 because I did the hacks and on the first one I also changed the colour of the text.Screenshot 2024-10-24 at 13 10 41Screenshot 2024-10-24 at 13 10 47Screenshot 2024-10-24 at 13 10 58Screenshot 2024-10-24 at 13 17 40

Game work, Hack Usage 1 .85

I added an NPC to my RPG and am currently working on adding dialogue to it so that you can ask it questions etc.Screenshot 2024-10-22 at 12 32 47

Web Site: Home Page, Ideas 1 0.9

Screenshot 2024-10-22 at 12 32 09

Total 7 5.35 : 6 = 0.89
Skill Points Grade Evidence
Work Habits (Analytics) 1 0.85 Screenshot 2024-10-22 at 12 38 51 Definitely still room for more. (Btw in case you’re wondering why I didn’t screenshot my analytics, it’s because it says I only have 4 commits and I am 100% sure that is not the case
Advocacy 1 0.9 I always try to engage in the task and participate as well as possible.
Beyond Perfunctory Memory 1 .85 I always, try to think further and connect some dots when learning new things, however I could definitely still improve there, which is why I gave myself a solid grade.
Total 3 0.87  

Sprint 3

Assignment Points Grade Evidence
Sprint 1-3 Review Ticket 3 3 sprint2screenshotsprint1screenshot
Sprint 3 Team Issue(s)/Plan 2 2 Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 20 19
Beginning-2-End Contribution 2 2 Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 29 35Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 25 15
N@tM Team Presentation 2 1 Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 17 39
Live Review Indi Demo 1 1 Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 23 23Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 24 19Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 28 22Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 28 09Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 26 52Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 26 45
Total 10 9 Overall, I gave myself a 9/10, because I think I understood everything pretty well and participated a lot as well. However I’m sure I wasn’t perfect and there is definitely room for improvement.
Skill Points Grade Evidence
Work Habits (Analytics) 1 1 Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 23 23
Evidence of Role in Team 1 1 Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 29 35Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 25 15
Function / Purpose Design 1 1 The purpose of my part in the lesson was to introduce nested condtionals by first refreshing everyone’s memory on conditionals, then elaborating adding a new concept and lastly test everyone’s knowledge and understanding with a popcorn hack. Lastly I also discussed how this could be used in their RPG, because first of all, it helps them connect new concepts to real examples and second of all, it could give them more ideas to improve their RPG.
Live Review 2 2 Similar to the Live Indi Demo, overall, I’ve worked on the introduction, popcornhack one and ideas for usage in the RPG.
Total 5 4.5 Overall, I gave myself a 4.5/5 because I believe I participated well and this project and met all the requiremnts.The only issue I had was messing up the pull request, causing me to finish it after Tuesday (aka the due date for the pull request), which is why I subtracted 0.5 points off of my total score.